With any issue that comes up, when we have an emergent…
““With any issue that comes up, when we have an emergent scientific truth, we can't just sit back and watch people debate a scientific truth -- they should be debating the politics that would follow from the emergent scientific truth. That’s really what the debates should be about, but they haven’t been. And I’m disturbed by that, because I don’t know what kind of democracy that is, if you’re gonna run around cherry-picking the results of science, of emergent scientific consensus because it conflicts with your philosophy and you want to be responsible for the governance of the nation, which involves thoughtful planning for the future of our health and our wealth, the state of the economy, all of the above.””
About This Quote
This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.
He argues scientific truths should spark political debate, not just scientific discussion, warning of cherry‑picking facts
In simple terms: Science should inform politics, not be isolated from it
Key Takeaway
Demand political accountability for scientific findings
Themes
science
politics
democracy
policy making
Mood
analytical
concerned
Type
political
educational
When to use this quote
- legislative hearings
- public forums
- media coverage
Key Concepts
emergent scientific consensus
governance challenges
Questions to Reflect On
- How can societies ensure science informs policy responsibly?
- What safeguards prevent selective use of scientific data?
A Different Perspective
Science can be politicized and misused