In sum, then, I have tried to show that reincarnation has…
““In sum, then, I have tried to show that reincarnation has very strong theoretical probability, without resorting to the paranormal evidence and even without being able to explain the transmission of memories. I have carefully avoided bringing in the moral and retributive arguments, since they have little force, and I do not find a person’s fortunes or misfortunes explained by a former life. I find the explanation postponed, as in all attempts to explain the present by the past. But it is basically an intellectual block to find it incredible that you have more than one life. It is just as incredible that we have this one. It is still more incredible to suppose that what has happened once cannot happen again.””
About This Quote
This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.
Watts argues that reincarnation is theoretically plausible without paranormal proof, but acknowledges the difficulty of explaining memory transmission and moral implications, noting the broader challenge of accepting multiple lives.
In simple terms: Reincarnation may be possible, but evidence and moral links are weak.
Key Takeaway
Consider reincarnation as a philosophical possibility, not a proven fact.
Themes
philosophy
metaphysics
life after death
Mood
thoughtful
inquisitive
Type
philosophical
analytical
When to use this quote
- personal reflection
- academic debate
- spiritual inquiry
- ethical discussion
Key Concepts
probability theory
memory transmission
ethical considerations
Questions to Reflect On
- How does the lack of memory evidence affect belief in reincarnation?
- Can moral arguments be separated from metaphysical claims?
A Different Perspective
The argument lacks empirical evidence for memory continuity.