Scientists have long known that Darwinism is false. They have adhered to the myth out of self-interest and a zealous desire to… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share Image
Darwinism is not merely a support for naturalistic philosophy: it is a product of naturalistic philosophy. — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share Image
The monopoly of science in the realm of knowledge explains why evolutionary biologists do not find it meaningful to address the question… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share Image
First, Darwinian theory tells us how a certain amount of diversity in life forms can develop once we have various types of… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share Image
Evolutionary biologists are not content merely to explain how variation occurs within limits, however. They aspire to answer a much broader question-which… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share Image
In short, it is not that evolutionary naturalists have been less brazen than the scientific creationists in holding science hostage, but rather… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share Image
Evolutionary biologists have been able to pretend to know how complex biological systems originated only because they treated them as black boxes.… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share Image
“One of the truly bizarre things about our current cultural situation is that the leading figures of the scientific establishment seem genuinely… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share Image
In the most important sense a creationist is a person who believes in creation, and that includes people who believe that Genesis… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share Image
The Intelligent Design movement starts with the recognition that "In the beginning was the Word," and "In the beginning God created." Establishing… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share Image
Science...has become identified with a philosophy known as materialism or scientific naturalism. This philosophy insists that nature is all there is, or… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share Image
A Chinese paleontologist lectures around the world saying that recent fossil finds in his country are inconsistent with the Darwinian theory of… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share Image
“I approach the creation-evolution dispute not as a scientist but as a problem of law, which means among other things that I… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share Image
“Biochemists assume that the three cellular kingdoms evolved from a single common ancestor, because the alternative of supposing an independent origin of… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share Image
“A second point that caught my attention was that the very persons who insist upon keeping religion and science separate are eager… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share Image
“Darvinizam je priča o oslobađanju čovječanstva od iluzije da njegovom sudbinom upravlja neka sila viša od njega.” — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share
In short, the proposition that God was in any way involved in our creation is effectively outlawed, and implicitly negated. — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share
First, Darwinian theory tells us how a certain amount of diversity in life forms can develop once we have various types of complex living… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share
Evolutionary biologists are not content merely to explain how variation occurs within limits, however. They aspire to answer a much broader question-which is how… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share
Materialism sets us free from sin-by proving that there is no such thing as sin. There's just antisocial behavior, which we can control with… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share
In short, it is not that evolutionary naturalists have been less brazen than the scientific creationists in holding science hostage, but rather that they… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share
“As students grow more and more accustomed to assuming materialism and naturalism in their academic work, the concept of creation by God gradually tends… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share
Although I insist that God has always had the power to intervene directly in nature to create new forms, I am willing to be… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share
“A second point that caught my attention was that the very persons who insist upon keeping religion and science separate are eager to use… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share
Modernism is typically defined as the condition that begins when people realize God is truly dead, and we are therefore on our own. — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share
“..."science" as defined in our culture has a philosophical bias that needs to be exposed. On the one hand, science is empirical. This means… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share
Scientists have long known that Darwinism is false. They have adhered to the myth out of self-interest and a zealous desire to put down… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share
“The whole thing seems absurdly easy - so easy that you ought to smell a rat.” — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share
The Intelligent Design movement starts with the recognition that "In the beginning was the Word," and "In the beginning God created." Establishing that point… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share
Most importantly, I agree that the truth of these matters should be determined by interpretation of scientific evidence - experiments, fossil studies and the… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share
